Speech
to Grants Pass City Council, 5/6/09.
I noticed, this last weekend, that the City has spread new
bark around the public market parking lot.
It appears that it may not be Red Death; its fines appear to be more
shredded than finely ground, and might not percolate toxins into the soil.
However, I have no experience with that particular grade of bark and cannot be
certain of its effects on soil life.
The City cannot be certain of its effects either, because it
has no testing program for mulches that I am aware of. So far, it has acted only on the unsupported and
contradictory words of its landscape contractors and its singular critic. There are also different staff people in
charge of mulching different city projects, if they pay attention to mulch at
all. The City’s actions regarding mulch
on City property, therefore, have been inconsistent, arbitrary, and capricious.
I therefore bring before you tonight, on the back side of
this speech and in your e-mail, a Resolution Regarding Mulches. I ask you to put it on your agenda in the
near future.
Why should you schedule this for discussion? Because it desperately needs to be
discussed—and debated, if there be any opposition.
I have been trying to start that debate for over 4
years. I started by passing out “Stop
Spreading Red Death!” leaflets at Grower’s Market and to various
businesses. I have spoken repeatedly to
the City Council about soil-killing mulch.
I have protested the Courier’s
avoidance of the subject on the street.
I talked to the Commissioners about it once—and didn’t need to again,
because the County has no money to waste on bark mulch, fine or otherwise.
I’ve heard for several years that the Master Gardeners are
now teaching that fine bark kills soil.
But landscape contractors and maintenance people are still spreading it
routinely, all over town, as mulch.
My public speeches and writings have impugned the competence
of nearly every landscape contractor in town, some by name. In all this time, no one has risen publicly
to say that I am wrong about fine bark killing soil. I have been told privately that the person
suspected it—but he keeps spreading it, because the customers like it.
Putting this Resolution on your agenda would force the
landscapers who spread fine bark to come before the Council to defend their
practice—or not. Considering that nobody
has yet risen to defend it, they probably won’t; the practice is
indefensible. The only way they have
been able to continue the practice for so long is by ignoring any debate about
it.
Please put this Resolution on your agenda, and let the
debate begin.
No comments:
Post a Comment